top of page
Search

Always Practice being a Non Hypocrite

  • Writer: Leo Mora
    Leo Mora
  • Feb 6
  • 2 min read


It is incredibly frustrating when leadership preaches "diplomacy" to avoid external friction while simultaneously practicing passive-aggressive neglect with their own internal team.

There is a massive double standard here. By withdrawing from communication while remaining a "ghost" in meetings, your bosses are violating the very professional etiquette they are asking you to uphold.


Here is a breakdown of how their behavior is inherently undiplomatic and has already "burned the bridge" from the top down.


1. The "Ghosting" Power Move


Diplomacy requires presence and engagement. By staying in the meeting invite without speaking or contributing for years, they have created a "panopticon" effect—where the team knows they are being watched but receives no guidance.


  • How it burns the bridge: It signals that the team’s time isn’t worth their active participation, but the team’s output is still subject to their silent surveillance. This destroys psychological safety.


2. Failure of the "Feedback Loop"

A diplomatic leader manages conflict through open channels. By refusing to answer emails or speak to the team for years, they have effectively shutdown the infrastructure of the workplace.

  • The Irony: They are telling you not to "burn bridges" with development partners, yet they have let the bridge between "Leadership" and "Team A” crumble into the river through total non-maintenance.


3. Tactical Avoidance vs. Professional Diplomacy


Your bosses are confusing avoiding discomfort with being diplomatic.

  • True Diplomacy: Addressing the DMS development issues firmly but respectfully to ensure the project succeeds.

  • Their Behavior: Ignoring the issues (and the people reporting them) to avoid the "messiness" of a difficult conversation.


The Reality of the Situation

In the context of your "Action-First" philosophy , their behavior is the antithesis of efficiency. While you are pushing for data-driven logistics and radical transparency, they are operating in a vacuum of radical opacity.


Diplomatic StandardYour Bosses' ActionsImpact Clear CommunicationYears of silence/unanswered emails Zero alignment; guesswork AccountabilityRemaining in meetings as a "user" onlyPassive surveillance; no support Conflict ResolutionTelling you to "be diplomatic" to others Deflection of their own leadership duty


The "Burned Bridge"


A bridge is burned when trust is rendered non-functional. You cannot cross a bridge if the person on the other side refuses to acknowledge you exist. By abandoning the weekly meetings without warning, they didn't just burn the bridge—they stopped guarding the road entirely.



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page